Moving from 2017 Retina 5K to Mac Mini. Recommendation/Suggestions?

It's time to upgrade my late 2014 iMac Retina 5k, 27" and am considering recommendations for the move to a new system.  


I primarily use Lightroom and Photoshop as an advanced hobbyist for image processing (not particularly video). All my work is done on a desktop and not mobile. I'm happy with the current 27" display but would consider an upgrade to a 32” monitor. I currently use about 3TB for all my images and my total system storage is 6.12TB.


Current configuration:

Running macOS Big Sur

iMac Retina 5K, 27 inch (3840 x 2160), Late 2014

Processor 3.5 GHz Quad Core Intel Core i5

Memory 24 GB 1600 MHz DDR3

Graphics AMD Radeon R9 M290X 2 GB


Storage 6.12 TB Fusion Drive (2.45 TB available)

External 8 TB USB disk for Time Machine


Considering


Mac Mini Pro (12‑core CPU, 16‑core GPU, 16‑core Neural Engine) with 1TB and storing large libraries on an external SSD.  

Total LR storage is 100GB (size of LR folder) whereas the catalog itself is 1.5GB.

SSD that was recommended to me was OWC Express 1M2 NVMe SSD - 8.0TB

I’d store the LR catalog on the 1TB SSD and the images on the external 8TB SSD.


Apple Studio Display 27” - speaker quality and built in camera approx. $1500

Open to other ideas on monitors but do enjoy the built in camera, excellent sound system and minimal cables from my Retina 5K. Apple’s Pro Display is more than I want to pay for my needs.


If other monitors don’t have integrated sound/camera, I’d need to purchase.


Thanks for your ideas,

Gary

Posted on Nov 8, 2025 5:48 PM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Nov 9, 2025 5:00 AM

Using Lightroom and Photoshop you are obviously aware of the high demands on RAM so I would suggest getting more than the 24GB of RAM because you cannot add more later unlike your iMac. With those apps and macOS, the future will only demand more and more RAM. I have used both apps over the years and have only seen them get more and more RAM hungry.


With the speeds of the OWC 1M2, I would move all photo stuff to the OWC drive including Lightroom catalogs, caches, and scratch and the same with Photoshop. I have a plain M4 chip and OWC 1M2 runs at the same speed as the internal. Actually, you could move nearly all of your stuff to the external drive and run a "bare minimum" 512GB internal saving you some bucks.


Personally, being what I would consider an advanced amateur photographer myself, if I could afford it, I would get a base MacStudio.

10 replies
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Nov 9, 2025 5:00 AM in response to gmarcos

Using Lightroom and Photoshop you are obviously aware of the high demands on RAM so I would suggest getting more than the 24GB of RAM because you cannot add more later unlike your iMac. With those apps and macOS, the future will only demand more and more RAM. I have used both apps over the years and have only seen them get more and more RAM hungry.


With the speeds of the OWC 1M2, I would move all photo stuff to the OWC drive including Lightroom catalogs, caches, and scratch and the same with Photoshop. I have a plain M4 chip and OWC 1M2 runs at the same speed as the internal. Actually, you could move nearly all of your stuff to the external drive and run a "bare minimum" 512GB internal saving you some bucks.


Personally, being what I would consider an advanced amateur photographer myself, if I could afford it, I would get a base MacStudio.

Nov 11, 2025 2:08 PM in response to gmarcos

I had a 2017 27" i9 iMac with an SSD boot drive and 16 GB of RAM. I was able to edit a 500Mb Photoshop image nearly the same as a 4 Mb image. The only difference was when I was trying to use the Retouch tool on the 500+ Mb file it was somewhat slow.


I now have a 10 Core Mac Mini M4 with 16 GB RAM and 1 TB SSD ($1084) with a 32" LG 4k monitor ($331) from Amazon.com)  is $1415 which is $541 less than a similarly configured new 24" iMac ($1956)  re 07/2025.


I got the above Mini with a 32" LG 4K monitor w/speakers for only $60 more than the 27" (didn't know the time that the Mini had a speaker).  There are many monitors available in 27" size on up for $100 to $500 depending on what features you want.  The monitor prices are before tariffs.


The M4 Mini runs rings around the Intel i9 iMac.


Nov 9, 2025 3:20 AM in response to gmarcos

I have a 27" 2017 iMac and 2 years ago bought a base model M2 mini which did everything twice as fast as my iMac.

Earlier this year I bought an M4 mini which is three times faster than the old 27 inch iMac. Once again I bought the base model which cost me £530 new. The only problem with the base model is that it has a very small hard drive or SSD. However this is not really a problem because I use an external SSD.

What is more I have installed the operating system on the external SSD and boot the mini from that. It is a 2TB NVME drive in a thunderbolt enclosure which cost around £170 in total.

What I am suggesting is that even the base model together with external SSDs would probably be more than enough for your requirements. I use mine mainly for video editing with Final Cut Pro and da Vinci Resolve. The old iMac was fine even with 4K but of course the M2 and M4 minis just blow it out of the water.

I use cheap Phillips 27 inch monitors one is a 1080p and the other 4K. They cost £110 and £170 respectively. You can of course plug the mini into any television using on HDMI cable and use that as a massive monitor.


Nov 9, 2025 3:07 PM in response to gmarcos

I just got the 10 Core Mac Mini M4 with 16 GB RAM and 1 TB SSD ($1084) with a 32" LG 4k monitor ($331) from Amazon.com)  is $1415 which is $541 less than a similarly configured new 24" iMac ($1956)  re 07/2025. Keep your keyboard and mouse from your current Mac for use with the Mini. 


I got the above Mini with a 32" LG 4K monitor w/speakers for only $60 more than the 27" (didn't know the Mini had a speaker).  There are many monitors available in 27" size on up for $100 to $500 depending on what features you want.  The monitor prices are before tariffs.


I'm able to open and edit a 500+ Mb Photoshop file with only some slowness in the initial opening. After that the normal editing I did was just as if I was working on a 4 Mb image file.


I find the 16 GB RAM in a Silicon Mac to be much, much faster than my 16GB of RAM in my i9 CPU 2017 iMac with an SSD drive. Unless you're editing some very large image files or heavy video editing you should be fine with the 16 GB basic RAM in the Silicon Macs.


Needless to say I'm a huge fan of the Mac Mini M4.


Nov 10, 2025 2:43 AM in response to gmarcos

This is the setup I have got with my M4 Mac mini.


I am using the keyboard and mouse from the old iMac. The M4 mac mini cost me £530 which is £69 cheaper than Apple and it has a two year warranty. The monitor is a Phillips 4K 27 inch screen which cost £180. The Logitech webcam cost £13 and the 2 TB thunderbolt NVME was £180 whilst they 2 TB USB– C came in at £101. The eight port USB dock was £25 and the pair of Harman Kardon speakers was £10. Total £1039.



The much cheaper USB-C NVMe is not as fast as the Thunderbolt but in normal use there is no difference and I will not be buying Thunderbolt again unless they start giving them away!


The Harman Kardon speakers are no longer available but perfectly respectable alternatives can be purchased for around £20.


You may notice that the Logitech 270 webcam is off-centre . . . that is because my M2 mini (8GB RAM) which is to the left of the photo is the machine I use most of the time and when I swivel to use the M4 I am seated slightly left of centre. The M2 is identically equipped except the monitor is 1080p and most of the time the difference is not noticeable.

Nov 10, 2025 12:51 PM in response to gmarcos

The advice you are getting to prioritize RAM over hard drive and to use an external SSD for your data is right on. I actually started doing this back around 2000 when I had to wait nearly 10 hours for all the data to transfer from my old PowerMac to the new one. Never again, I screamed! And now that it isn’t possible to upgrade hard drives and Apple’s HD prices are so absurdly high, it isn’t just better convenience, it is easier on the wallet. My current system is a M2 mini with 2 OWC Elite external drives, a Logitech webcam and 32 inch LG display.

Nov 10, 2025 1:17 PM in response to gmarcos

Unless you are really keen on spending $1500, there are other displays out there, though built in camera and mic may be a sticking point on many.


Here's one from Philips, a fifth of the price.

click here ➜ Philips 34E1C5600HE 34" UltraWide QHD 21:9 Monitor with Built-in Windows Hello Webcam & Noise Canceling Mic, USB-C Docking, Stereo Speakers, 100Hz - Amazon.com. $320


or here ➜ LG 32UR500K-B Ultrafine 32-inch 4K UHD (3840x2160) Computer Monitor HDR10 Built-in Speaker x2 - Amazon.com (no camera or mic though) $199



Nov 12, 2025 2:26 AM in response to gmarcos

By all means spend as much as you want but it is probably not necessary.


If you have a couple of minutes to spare, watch this mini tutorial I made a couple of years ago demonstrating the "invisibility" effect using Final Cut Pro.


It was made on my basic M2 with only 8GB RAM. What is more, the mini was booted from a very slow USB 3.0 SATA SSD but just look at how crisp and responsive the machine behaves . . . it changes things almost before I have hit the keys!


Furthermore the mini was simultaneously recording the video and audio from the screen.


8GB RAM M2 mini Test


Remember that the basic M4 is half as fast again.

Nov 11, 2025 5:48 PM in response to gmarcos

Thanks for all the thoughtful suggestions. Your time and effort is appreciated. I definitely will be upping the RAM in my mini product choice from the base from 24GB to 48GB. I tend to keep my systems for a long time and lean towards the future-proofing as much as one reasonably can so I think I'll stick with the 1TB SDD and an an external 8TB SSD. It's not the leanest/meanest cost solution, but it's my personal system and it doesn't need to be.


I was wondering if there were suggestions on SSD choices and enclosures. SSDs seem easier to evaluate but the enclosure reviews are a bit squirrely. All things being equal, I'd prefer an enclosure that has a form factor so the mini can sit on top (or below) and if the enclosure had a built it SD / TF (micro SD) slot. I've looked at some good enclosure reviews. However, in a recent evaluation by Craig Neidel on his YouTube channel (External Mac Storage with 4 x M.2 NVMe SSDs and 40 Gbps - up to 32TB Easy - TerraMaster D4 SSD), It got me to thinking there is something which I had not considered which is system backup. Watching the video, it seems to me that I could put in two 8TB SSD cards, and use one as a drive for TimeMachine. So, one SSD would be for additional storage for the mini and the other acting as a backup drive. I understand the concepts of backup drives, raid etc, but the actual implementation I'm not familiar with on the mac in the variations in which one might do configuration. I currently have two time machine external drives on my iMac, one of which is always there (but I do put away elsewhere when I travel in case of fire/theft...) and the other drive I back up once a month and take to my son's house for 'remote' storage in case of a real disaster. So, I think I could use the TerraMaster mentioned above for the 1st backup and then purchase a second less robust (and less expensive) SSD enclosure which is my offsite storage. Just wondering what people might be thinking about going this direction. I understand I might be giving up the SD/TF slots and I could purchase an additional external device for that purpose. Thanks.

Moving from 2017 Retina 5K to Mac Mini. Recommendation/Suggestions?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.