Why is my Mac mini M4 Pro display resolution low and how can I adjust it?

I have a MacBook Pro M1, and a 5k LG monitor with 5120 x 2160 res. When I use it I can use the "default" setting which is 3840 x 1620 and it is perfect for me.


I just got a new Mac mini M4 pro. Its default for the same monitor is 3360 x 1418, and the resolution kinda sucks. But there is only one high res option at 5120 x 2160 which is way too small to see things.


Is there a way around this that I am not aware of? would the same issue be on the studio? I do not understand where the limitation comes from unless it has something to do with the MacBook Pro m1 having a certain res on the built in display. But that would make me think the mini should be able to do that res no matter what because there is no built in display.


both are using same thunderbolt cable.


Also both are using same OS version.


here is the options :



Thanks,

Brandon


[Re-Titled by Moderator]



Posted on Nov 14, 2024 6:58 PM

Reply

Similar questions

55 replies

Jan 10, 2025 10:48 AM in response to georg_peter_p

Yes, it seems this feature only works with the Dell 4025QW. Interestingly, some people have even sold their LG 40" monitors to switch to the Dell 4025QW. I’m currently using an LG 40" with the M4 Pro and have no plans to sell it for another 40" monitor, especially one that’s already a year old since its release. Many of us have submitted feedback to Apple and are now waiting for a fix for the M4.

Dec 31, 2024 1:28 PM in response to Greg Earle

Greg Earle wrote:

As someone who also has the LG 34" 34BK95U-W UltraFine display (but no M4 Mac), I have to ask - if you think 5120x2160 is "too small", then why did you buy a 5K2K display? You could've just bought a smaller 30" WQXGA 2560x1600 display or something and use the full resolution rather than upscaling.

Not saying that Apple shouldn't fix this of course, but I'm curious. 🤷🏼

Speaking for myself, because 3840x1620 is a lot more screen real estate than 2560x1600. The highest available scaled option on the M4 with the current macOS is 3360x1418, which is noticeably (to me) less than 3840x1620.


Also, WQXGA is a 16:10 aspect ratio and that would completely defeat the purpose of choosing an ultrawide monitor like the ones under discussion that have a 21:9 aspect ratio. 5K:2K is like a 4K display that’s 1/3 wider.


Also, everyone has said the M1-based Macs are fine - what about M2 or M3? No one out there in thread-land with any of those who can chime in?

Reports elsewhere indicate M2 and M3 Macs support 3840x1620 (I haven’t tried myself but could connect my wife’s 14” M3 Pro MBP). Seems this issue is specific to M4 chips.

Feb 28, 2025 12:04 PM in response to Andreas_CGN

Since Apple has not done anything (even in Sequoia 15.3.1), I doubt there are any newer experiences.


I personally would not buy an M4 Pro Mac mini until this is sorted out. I also have an LG 5K2K Ultrawide (34") display and this situation frustrates me no end.


I have even been considering buying an M3 Pro or M3 Max MacBook Pro to avoid this problem, which I'd really rather not have to do. (Additionally, remember that M4-based Mac minis also have the problem of USB-C devices randomly disconnecting when connected to the back-side ports.)

May 20, 2025 11:16 AM in response to MZGERM

@MZGERM There is no news from any of us or from Apple. Apparently Apple does not consider it a problem, as there have been several point releases of macOS Sequoia released since this issue was first posted (both on here and on the Macrumors forums) and no fix has been forthcoming. I have the same LG monitor you have and I have balked at buying a new M4-based Mac (of any kind) because of this issue.

Dec 2, 2024 6:47 PM in response to brandonfromsaint charles

I just got the new Mac mini M4 Pro, same issue with the same monitor. I have my MBP M1 Pro plugged in, and the 3840x1620 is the best resolution for me since the 5120x2160 makes things very small.


I'm trying to look for a fix for this, unfortunately if nothings comes up, I will return the Mac mini. I had bought the regular Mac mini and had the same problem, I thought it could be the non-pro chip, unfortunately it wasn't.

Dec 30, 2024 5:37 PM in response to brandonfromsaint charles

As someone who also has the LG 34" 34BK95U-W UltraFine display (but no M4 Mac), I have to ask - if you think 5120x2160 is "too small", then why did you buy a 5K2K display? You could've just bought a smaller 30" WQXGA 2560x1600 display or something and use the full resolution rather than upscaling.


Not saying that Apple shouldn't fix this of course, but I'm curious. 🤷🏼


Also, everyone has said the M1-based Macs are fine - what about M2 or M3? No one out there in thread-land with any of those who can chime in?

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Why is my Mac mini M4 Pro display resolution low and how can I adjust it?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.